Saturday, October 2, 2010
"We thought we were almost done with XMRV..."
Friday, October 1, 2010
Help Wanted -- Quackologists Need Not Apply
Craigslist. I think this is just stunningly brilliant! What a great Commando
Advocacy tactic! Free, easy, takes 5 minutes.
Tuesday, October 5, is one week before the kickoff of the CFSAC meeting.
Wouldn't it be cool if we could all put ads in our local Craigslists on that
day, and then send a press release out announcing what we've done?
Anybody game?
New blog at
http://cfsuntied.com/blog2/2010/09/30/help-wanted-%e2%80%93-quackologists-need-not-apply-2/
Thanks, all! And thanks Kati!
khalyal@yahoo.com
khaly@cfsuntied.com
National Disabilities Employment Awareness Month
"When you can't come back" by Dave and Jan Dravecky
We finally have researchers who are asking the right questions on CFS. (God bless the Whittemores and Dr. Judy!) As I said to Andrea Whittemore when we finally met face-to-face after months of internet communication, "thank you for getting sick." The Whittemore family definitely opted for "what good can come out of this so that others may benefit?" and millions of patients are glad they did.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Life as we know it
http://cfs-facts.blogspot.com/2008/02/top-10-tests-that-should-be-done.html
A lesson from Mom: Don't be a 'good' patient - CNN.com
1. Ask lots of questions. If you don't understand something, ask for clarification, and if you still don't understand, ask again. The doctor or nurse might be visibly annoyed, but that shouldn't stop you. Remember, your health depends on your ability to comprehend what the doctor is telling you.
2. Don't worry whether your doctor likes you. If you hesitate to do anything that might upset the doctor, such as asking lots of questions, you're putting your health in jeopardy. While it's a natural inclination to want to be liked, your health comes first and your popularity second.
3. Remember that this is a business transaction. You're paying the doctor for a service; you're not in a popularity contest. Of course, you're respectful of the doctor, just as you're respectful to a waitress or your car mechanic, but you don't owe it to your doctor to be the perfect patient.
* * *
If you know you have CFS and the doctor doesn't want to prescribe anything but anti-depressants, stand up to him. Your health is more important than his ego.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
CFS Brainwashing Test
has been completed. Since the file is too long to be posted (12
pages), it is available online. The URL is,
http://www.me-net.combidom.com/quack/quack13.htm
In this 7th update, based on ~1200 files on CFS quackery, almost
all CFS quack tests, CFS therapies, and other CFS myths that have
been debunked by sciensists are explained. There even has been
found a secret message in the name 'myalgic encephalomyelitis'
itself - it is an *anagram of something else*.
The scenario is explained and so are the techniques to misled
patients and their doctors. Everything is there. The CFS quackery
scenario has been demythologized, CFS being reduced to what it
really is.
Marc Fluks
Better E-ddress for Advocacy
the XMRV meeting and whose statement you read in ProHealth, advises me
of the following:
* *A better email address to use for Director Francis Collins is
collinsf@od.nih.gov .
*
* *Add to the list of areas of concern the need to use the Canadian
Consensus Criteria for all ME/CFS research.*
Thanks for the information Rivka and your service on behalf of all of us.
Pat Sonnett on behalf of the
Miami CFIDS Support & Advocacy Group
Improved Access to Clinical Trials
NORD Press Release
House Passes Improving Access to Clinical Trials Act
Washington DC-----In a victory for rare disease patients and families,
the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday passed the Improving
Access to Clinical Trials Act (I-ACT). The bill, which passed the
Senate August 5, goes now to the White House where President Obama is
expected to sign it.
"This is a victory for the rare disease community," said NORD
President and CEO Peter L. Saltonstall. "This legislation will
support the development of new therapies by removing a barrier that
might keep patients from participating in important research studies."
The legislation changes the eligibility requirements for Social
Security Supplemental Income (SSI) and Medicaid so that compensation
of up to $2,000 for participating in clinical trials won't be
considered income in SSI and Medicaid determinations.
NORD has worked with the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and other patient
advocacy groups in support of this legislation. NORD and several of
its Member Organizations signed a recent letter on behalf of the
Improving Access Act sent to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH).
"We're grateful to our Member Organizations for their support on this
important issue," Saltonstall said. "This is one more reminder that—
when we speak together—we are able to bring about change that improves
the lives of patients and families affected by rare diseases."
____________________________
Contact:
Mary Dunkle
mdunkle@rarediseases.org
ADVOCACY ALERT
***
ADVOCACY ALERT:
Write letters to Director Collins before the CFSAC meeting scheduled for
Oct. 12-14, 2010, preferably within the next week so there will be ample
time to forward them to the appropriate parties.
Francis S. Collins, M.D., PhD.
Director, National Institutes of Health
Francis.Collins@nih.hhs.gov
ProHealth recently published an article on the September 7th meeting of
the three high-up NIH officials with a group of nine ME/FS patients and
their families and Dr. Dan Peterson prior to the XMRV conference.
Please refer to that posting at
www.prohealth.com/library/showarticle.cfm?libid=15587 for detailed
information. Portions of that meeting will be referred to below. Dr.
Michael Gottesman, Chief of NCI's Laboratory of Cell Biology and
Director of the NIH Office of Intramural Research, indicated at the
meeting that letters should be written stating our specific concrete
grievances and concerns and sent to the Director Collins' office where
he promised they will be addressed and forwarded to the right person
with the Director's office. We need to take advantage of this
opportunity and send letters to Director Collins before the next CFSAC
meeting so the NIH representatives at the meeting will be aware of them.
You will note in the article that a number of areas of concern were
addressed by the patients.
* The need for Trust Building.
* The need for Funding (they suggested $100 million over two years).
* The need for Centers of Excellence funded by the NIH.
* The need for Funding for Fast-Track Clinical Trials for Treatments.
* The need for Attention to Pediatric CFS.
In addition to the items listed above, the NIH puts in the Program
Announcement the sorts of research it would be willing to fund and the
last Program Announcement didn't include clinical trials. We need to
request that they be included.
* It is critical that any future NIH Program Announcement include
translational, phase 1, phase 2 and even phase 3 clinical trials.
You might also want to refer back to your recent CFSAC public testimony
(if you prepared one) and address some of those issues which may include
some of the above items as well as others, i.e.:
* Difficulty in being approved for or in receiving disability insurance.
* Difficulty in obtaining access to health care for CFS.
You obviously don't need to cover every suggested item, just the ones
you feel strongly about. It is very important, however, that you take
the time to write Director Collins to make sure he knows we're paying
attention to what's going on. Dr. Gottesman indicated to the patients
and Dr. Peterson that they would meet again in the future, possibly
within three months, so this is an excellent opportunity to make our
concerns known, not only for the CFSAC meeting but also the possible
future patient meeting.
Thank you for participating in this letter-writing campaign. Once
again, we have an opportunity to be heard, but we are only effective if
enough small voices join together to become a loud roar . Please don't
let this opportunity slip away.
Pat Sonnett on behalf of
Miami CFIDS Support & Advocacy Group
No Meeting of Minds on XMRV’s Role in Chronic Fatigue, Cancer
17 SEPTEMBER 2010 VOL 329 SCIENCE
www.sciencemag.org
BETHESDA, MARYLAND - For the past few years, researchers have been
tantalized by reports linking a new retrovirus to some cases of
prostate cancer and, more recently-and more controversially-the
mysterious illness chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). With the excitement
over discovering a possible new cause for these diseases, however, has
come skepticism, as some groups have found scarcely a trace of the
novel virus, called XMRV. Many hoped a 1.5-day workshop* here last
week would help resolve the controversy. Instead, the field remains
mired in "a zone of chaos," concluded co-organizer and retrovirologist
John Coffin of Tufts University in Boston and the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) in Frederick, Maryland. "We don't have agreement on
almost anything."
Still, in spirited discussions, sometimes frustrated-sounding
researchers had a chance to air their findings and discuss ways to
move forward. At the meeting Francis Collins, director of the National
Institutes of Health, announced that NIH is funding a new study that
could help resolve whether the presence of XMRV varies with geography
or whether differences in how labs prepare and test samples explain
the varying results.
XMRV, which resembles a mouse retrovirus, was discovered in 2006 in a
group of men with a hereditary form of prostate cancer. Some groups
have since confirmed the finding, but others, particularly in Europe,
have not. Then a year ago, a report in Science linked XMRV to CFS, a
disease in volving fatigue and muscle pain mostly in middle-age women
(Science, 9 October 2009, p. 215). Although patient groups were
ecstatic to finally have a potential cause for what some people
consider not a true disease, the study, led by Judy Mikovits of the
Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada, met with doubts
as other groups failed to confirm it (Science, 15 January, p. 254).
This summer, scientists at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) found no XMRV in blood from CFS patients, while a
team at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and NIH reported
finding genes from a group of viruses closely related to XMRV, dubbed
MLV-related viruses, in 87% of 37 blood samples from CFS patients and
in 7% of healthy people (Science, 27 August, p. 1000). Differences in
virus-detection methods or in how patients were diagnosed or recruited
could help explain the discrepancies, the two sets of authors
suggested.
At last week's workshop, 220 scientists and others ran through many of
the published studies, as well as some new unpublished ones. For
example, Mikovits has now found XMRV in patients in England with CFS.
She defended her group's original findings: "We have independent
confirmation from three groups," she said at the workshop. But some
participants raised concerns about possible sources of stray mouse
DNA, from knives for slicing tumors to the heparin sometimes used to
stabilize blood samples. Tufts immunologist Brigitte Huber reported
that her lab initially found almost no XMRV in CFS patient samples,
but when they tested more samples from patients and healthy people
prepared a different way, many were positive. These samples turned out
to contain endogenous mouse retrovirus DNA, probably from a
contaminated reagent, said Huber: "It's a false positive in our
hands."
One underlying issue is that the polymerase chain reaction assay used
to detect XMRV-the assay copies and amplifies pieces of DNA-is so
sensitive that it can detect extremely small traces of viral
sequences, the amount in a milliliter of water from a swimming pool in
which a drop of mouse blood has been mixed, Coffi n said. This makes
it easy to pick up contaminant mouse viral DNA. Even if XMRV is
present in some tumors, the reported levels are so low that it's
unclear how it could contribute to the development of cancer, says
pathologist Angelo De Marzo of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore,
Maryland. "The data [are] very noncompelling," says De Marzo, whose
lab, working with NCI's Alan Rein, failed to find XMRV in nearly 800
prostate tumor samples.
Some meeting participants said the only way to establish that XMRV
actually causes CFS and isn't simply a "passenger" virus that doesn't
contribute to the illness is to treat CFS patients with antiretroviral
drugs. Coffin cautioned that it would be "premature" to do so without
an assay to monitor the amount of XMRV in a patient's blood, as is now
done with AIDS patients on antiviral therapy. But if such a test is
developed, "I would not be averse to doing very small studies under
tightly controlled clinical conditions," he said.
Hoping to figure out what's going on, a federal working group
involving labs at FDA, CDC, WPI, and elsewhere has compared results
for blood samples to which various amounts of XMRV had been added.
(All six labs detected it.) The group has also tested four WPI samples
from CFS patients but isn't ready to discuss the results because
"we're still confused by them," says Coffin, who is part of the
working group.
More answers could come from the study Collins announced. National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci
has asked Columbia University epidemiologist W. Ian Lipkin to collect
blood samples from 100 CFS patients from four parts of the United
States and 100 healthy people and send blinded samples to the FDA,
CDC, and WPI labs for testing. "We're interested in settling a
discrepant observation," Fauci says.
Chaos may still reign, but Coffin thinks order may emerge over the
next year. If nothing else, he says, "people left the meeting talking
to each other when they weren't always before. I hope that will
continue."
–JOCELYN KAISER
*1st International Workshop on XMRV, 7–8 September 2010, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstracts and select presentation slides from the 1st XMRV Workshop
Workshop have been made available online.
Main page-
http://www.virology-education.com/index.cfm/t/Workshop_material/vid/1A5D65BD-FB8B-8AE1-5E10829372D080B4
Abstracts-
http://regist2.virology-education.com/abstractbook/2010_8.pdf
Available presentations-
http://regist2.virology-education.com/1XMRV/7_September.html
http://regist2.virology-education.com/1XMRV/8_September.html
The Whittemore Peterson Institute: Building Bridges
Public Sector Collaboration
Annette Whittemore*
*
*
*
The Whittemore Peterson Institute's (WPI) publication of its ground-breaking
study on October 8, 2009, of the link between a cancer-related retrovirus,
XMRV, and patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome
("ME/CFS") brings a desperately needed legitimacy to a complex yet
controversial and misunderstood disease
*(1<http://molinterv.aspetjournals.org/content/10/3/120.long#ref-1>
)*. News of this significant association brought hope to millions around the
world who have suffered in silence from its devastating effects. Perhaps,
just as important, the discovery of XMRV infection in humans allows the
medical world to construct a testable hypothesis of how XMRV may cause or
contribute to illnesses across a wide spectrum of chronic inflammatory
diseases and cancers and new paradigms of treatment and perhaps prevention.
That the discovery happened in just three years of a small research
institute's existence1<http://molinterv.aspetjournals.org/content/10/3/120.long#fn-1>is
almost as amazing as the extraordinary scientific work. This is the
story
of how and why the Whittemore Peterson Institute came to be. It is a story
of multiple collaborations at every level, revealing a blueprint for other
groups of dedicated scientists, doctors, and philanthropists to create
greater progress through unique and selfless partnerships across
nontraditional boundaries. Like other philanthropic endeavors, it began as
an idea evidenced through personal suffering and acted upon after all other
avenues had failed.
The personal decision to commit time and money to build an institute for
patients with neuroimmune diseases came from a desperate need for medical
solutions to a disease that had been destroying our daughter's life for over
twenty years. We were also faced with the reality that experienced
physicians were retiring without passing on their knowledge of ME/CFS to new
physicians (Box
1<http://molinterv.aspetjournals.org/content/10/3/120.long#boxed-text-1>).
In addition, the existing medical establishment lacked both knowledge and
medical tools to effectively treat patients who suffered the debilitating
effects of this neurological
disease2<http://molinterv.aspetjournals.org/content/10/3/120.long#fn-2>.
Around the world, those who suffer with ME/CFS have been told that their
physical disorder is a manifestation of a psychiatric disease. Subsequently,
these patients may then be denied medical support by their government-run
health care programs.
Full article can be found at:
http://molinterv.aspetjournals.org/content/10/3/120.long
Komaroff Webinar Available
CFS & The Viral Connection
Speaker: Anthony Komoroff, M.D.
Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010
Recording of presentation:
http://www.cfids.org/webinar/091610.wmv
Slides of presentation:
http://www.cfids.org/webinar/slides-091610.pdf
CFS researcher and clinician Dr. Anthony Komaroff of Harvard Medical
School and Brigham and Women's Hospital explored some of the
infectious agents and illnesses connected to CFS, including
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Human Herpesvirus (HHV)-6, Q-fever, Ross
River virus, Lyme Disease, Parvovirus, Borna disease virus, Influenza
A (H1N1) virus (swine flu), retroviruses, enteroviruses and
mycoplasmas.
Cheney's notes on XMRV
a few groups tonight. Permission to re-post as long as Dr Cheney is
acknowledged."
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/MEActionUK/message/63373
==============================================
From Dr Cheney
I attended and was a poster presenter at the recently completed XMRV
conference at the NIH. It was fascinating and I took perhaps 30 pages
of notes. The bio-political undertones were also intense but I have
to say that the presentations of XMRV association with CFS (4
presentations) were much stronger than the presentations of negative
XMRV associations with CFS (4 presentations). They were stronger
specifically because of the multiple methods they employed and not
just PCR.
Very interesting in this regard were comments by the head of the blood
working group at the NIH who is trying to determine the cause of the
discrepancy. He hinted strongly that it is the way blood is collected
and processed for nucleic acids and not the detection methods for XMRV
itself that divides the two groups.
In an NIH blood group sponsored study, a group comparison study with
both camps represented detect successfully, in a blinded fashion, XMRV
spiked buffer in varying concentrations but they nevertheless divide
into two camps when clinical blood samples are taken and processed for
XMRV nucleic acids. Using only PCR, one camp sees ~80% positive in
CFS and one camp sees 0% positive in CFS
There is no one in between and no middle ground between the two groups
which was striking and noted by Joe B. who was also in attendance.
There is no evidence by mouse mitochondrial DNA probes, that any of
the positive associations were
contaminated. However, one of the negative association speakers found
non-human mouse virus MLV contamination perhaps localized to heparin
tubes used for blood collection. Heparin is often produced in China
where mice are common as pets.
When the contamination was cleared, she found no association of XMRV with CFS.
I also wanted to share some other highlights of the conference Among
them, a very interesting presentation was made by a group connected to
Abbott Labs that infected male and female Macaques (monkeys closely
related to man) with human XMRV to see what happens and where the
virus ends up or concentrates itself.
Within a few weeks, the virus was largely cleared from blood where it
was initially injected in high concentration. Even antibody response
was lost over time (months) as the infection was largely removed from
the blood and virus did not appear to persist in the blood.
Apparently, there was not enough viral antigen to keep antibody levels
high or persistent.
However, the virus was found more or less in every organ, at least
initially, and thought to be carried around the body in T-cells and
B-cells during the active phase of infection. This is consistent with
the ubiquitous nature of the Xpr1 receptor used by the virus to gain
access to almost all cells of the body. Organs where the virus was
initially most concentrated appeared to be lymphoid organs such as the
spleen, liver and mesenteric nodes of the GI track and in sex organs
and in particular the epithelium of the prostate gland where it was
highly concentrated at first and then the infected cells later
apoptosed and infection disappeared from the epithelium and then the
virus was more likely to be seen in the interstitial cells in the
stroma or matrix of the prostate, especially the fibroblasts which may
be one reservoir in all the various organs that are initially
infected. The virus was also found in the epithelium of the cervix in
the female macaque.
Over time, the infections of various organs tended to be cleared by
either immune mechanisms but especially by restriction enzyme systems
present in almost all human cells that hypermutate the virus so it
cannot persist as a competent infectious agent. Indeed, mutated viral
strains are almost always found in CFS cases by both Judy Mikovits at
WPI and Frank Ruscetti at NCI. Sometimes this makes the virus
incompetent as an infectious agent and sometimes has no effect on
infectiousness.
Very interesting is that another cell that appears to be a reservoir
of XMRV other then fibroblasts within tissue stroma are tissue
macrophages The pulmonary alveolar macrophages were absolutely loaded
with XMRV virus and other tissue macrophages could also be a potential
reservoir in other tissues as well, especially in the GI tract, sex
organs and sinuses. Tissue macrophage reservoirs would be analogous
with HIV as well.
It would seem that bronchial secretions, nasal secretions and sex
organ secretions as well as feces and urine are well positioned to
help the virus to spread itself to other macaques, especially if
activated.
As for activation of more or less low level or quiescent but
persistent infectious virus, there seem to be several mechanisms. The
virus has both a glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and an androgen
response element (ARE) in its promotor region. It also has binding
regions for NK Kappa B proteins in its response elements. In any
organ with high levels of local androgenic
stimulation such as the prostate and perhaps during puberty, the virus
could activate. No mention was made of the effect of the predominant
female sex hormones but estrogen is the equivalent androgen-like
hormone in females.
As for the GRE in the promotor region, severe stress will activate the
virus or the use of glucocortocoid hormones and perhaps any precursor
steroid hormone such as pregnenolone. As for the NF Kappa B sites,
any strong immune response with an associated cytokine storm would
also be a strong stimulant and such stimulation certainly occurs in
the bronchial tree which is frequently stimulated with antigen,
especially during allergy season.
Perhaps most interesting of all was what happened with the injection
of a bolus of foreign peptides into macaques that had apparently
completely cleared the virus from blood. There was a huge
reactivation of infectious virus in the blood proving that latent but
persistent virus is just below the surface and that XMRV infection
cannot be completely cleared from all reservoir sites. The peptide
injection mimics an acute infection (? borrelia or the flu), an
immunization or even acute mold exposure.
The effect of XMRV infection over time was not studied in the macaque
but a similar gammaretrovirus called Feline Leukemia virus (FeLV) has
been well studied in cats for decades. I will in another post
describe a most interesting talk at this conference by a veterinarian
on the life history of infection by a gammaretrovirus in cats.
Paul Cheney, M.D.
XMRV and Ampligen
=======================================================================
"The XMRV antibody positive cohort had a greater relative percentage of
subjects showing a >25% increase in ETT with Ampligen(R) treatment compared
to placebo than the XMRV antibody negative cohort. The results also suggest
that the XMRV antibody negative subjects with CFS have a lower activity
level and a reduced ability to complete normal daily activities at
baseline."
=======================================================================
http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=200987
Source: Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.
Hemispherx Biopharma to Present New Retrovirus (XMRV) Data at 1st
International Workshop on XMRV and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
Retrovirus Positive CFS Patients Show Enhanced Response to Ampligen(R), an
Experimental Therapeutic, Relative to XMRV Negative Group
BETHESDA, Md., Sept. 8, 2010 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.
(AMEX:HEB) will present new clinical data on the possible
inter-relationships of XMRV positivity/chronic fatigue syndrome/AmpligenR
responsiveness at the 1st International Workshop on XMRV being held at the
National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD, on September 7 and 8, 2010.
CFS is a severe disorder consisting of profound fatigue and a variety of
other debilitating symptoms that affects up to 4 million Americans.
Recently, DNA was identified from a human gamma retrovirus (XMRV) in 67% of
CFS subjects. Evidence also suggested that approximately 50% of the CFS
subjects mounted a specific antibody response against XMRV (Science 326,
585-589 (2009)). The objective of this study was to compare demographic
parameters and health/performance status of XMRV antibody positive vs.
negative CFS subjects enrolled in a Phase III clinical trial evaluating the
safety and efficacy of a toll-like receptor 3 agonist, rintatolimod
(PolyI:PolyC12U, AmpligenR). The response to AmpligenR with regard to the
primary endpoint, treadmill exercise tolerance testing (ETT), in this
population was also evaluated.
Two-hundred-eight (208) evaluable subjects, who met the original (1988) and
revised (1994) Centers for Disease Control criteria for CFS, participated in
this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study. Only
severely debilitated patients with a Karnofsky Performance Scale between
40-60 were selected for this study. The primary endpoint was exercise
treadmill duration. Subjects received AmpligenR (200-400 mg) or an
equivalent volume of placebo (saline) twice weekly by intravenous infusion
for 40 weeks. Baseline (or earliest available specimen) serum samples from
all 208 subjects were analyzed for antibodies directed against XMRV.
The XMRV antibody positive cohort had a greater relative percentage of
subjects showing a >25% increase in ETT with AmpligenR treatment compared to
placebo than the XMRV antibody negative cohort. The results also suggest
that the XMRV antibody negative subjects with CFS have a lower activity
level and a reduced ability to complete normal daily activities at baseline.
If validated as a relevant basis for targeting the XMRV positive CFS patient
sub-population, the observed response advantage of the XMRV may translate
into needing a smaller sample size for future research using a
placebo-controlled parallel design to obtain 80% power (รก=0.05): 216 XMRV
antibody positive subjects vs. 330 XMRV antibody negative subjects.
Additional studies to further evaluate XMRV in this CFS population are
currently underway.
About Hemispherx Biopharma
Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. is an advanced specialty pharmaceutical company
engaged in the clinical development of new drug entities for treatment of
seriously debilitating disorders. Hemispherx's flagship products include
Alferon N InjectionT (FDA approved for a category of sexually transmitted
diseases) and the experimental therapeutics AmpligenR and Alferon LDOT.
AmpligenR represents experimental nucleic acids being developed for globally
important debilitating diseases and disorders of the immune system.
Hemispherx's platform technology includes agents for potential treatment of
various severely debilitating and life threatening diseases. Hemispherx has
an extensive number of patents comprising its core intellectual property
estate and a fully commercialized product (Alferon N InjectionT). The
Company wholly owns and exclusively operates a GMP certified manufacturing
facility in the United States. For more information, please visit
www.hemispherx.net
Information contained in this news release, other than historical
information, should be considered forward-looking and is subject to various
risk factors and uncertainties. For instance, the strategies and operations
of Hemispherx involve risk of competition, changing market conditions,
change in laws and regulations affecting these industries and numerous other
factors discussed in this release and in the Company's filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Any specifically referenced
investigational drugs and associated technologies of the Company (including
AmpligenR and AlferonR LDO) are experimental in nature and as such are not
designated safe and effective by a regulatory authority for general use and
are legally available only through clinical trials with the referenced
disorders. The forward-looking statements represent the Company's judgment
as of the date of this release. The Company disclaims, however, any intent
or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. The planning,
completion, results or submission of clinical trials do not imply that any
study product will ever be approved commercially for the studied or other
treatment indications.
CONTACT: Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.
Company/Investor Contact:
Dianne Will
518-398-6222 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
518-398-6222 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ir@hemispherx.net
Oct 17 New Jersey Conference
and
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER
Co-host
NJCFSA 2010 Fall Conference
ME/CFS: New Perspectives in Research, Advocacy, Education and Disability
The Sheraton Eatontown Hotel Conference Center
Eatontown, New Jersey
Sunday October 17, 2010
Program
11:30 -12:30 pm Registration, exhibits and buffet lunch
12:30 - 12:45 pm Introduction & Welcome: Kenneth Friedman, Ph.D
Moderator: Malcolm Schwartz, DO
12:45-1:45 pm Judy A. Mikovits, Ph.D. : " XMRV, a New Human Pathogen in
CFS?"
1:45-2:30 pm James M. Oleske, M.D.,M.P.H.: "Listening to and Learning From
the Testimony of Patients with CFIDS at the CFSAC."
2:30-2:45 pm Coffee, tea and beverage break
2:45-3:00 pm Presentation of Awards
3:00-3:45 pm Susan M. Levine M.D.: "New Insights in CFS Research and
Education Policy."
3:45-4:30 pm Barbara Comerford Esq.: "Overcoming the Many Legal Challenges
for CFS Patients: From Education Law to Obtaining Disability Benefits."
4:30-5:00 pm Question and Answer Panel Session-all speakers
Monmouth Medical Center relies upon faculty in its CME Program to provide
educational information that is objective and as unbiased as possible. In
accordance with the nationally accepted guidelines, faculty is asked to
indicate any commercial relationship that might be perceived as a real or
apparent conflict of interest. Monmouth Medical Center is an approved
provider of continuing nursing education by New Jersey State Nurses
Association, an accredited approver, by the American Nurses Credentialing
Center's Commission on Accreditation. (P91-12/2007-2010)
This activity has been approved for AMA PRA credit. Nursing contact hours
have been applied
CFSAC videocasts October 12/13/14
View event: You will be able to view the event at
http://videocast.nih.gov when the event is live.
http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=9505
Air date: Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 8:30:00 AM
Time displayed is Eastern Time, Washington DC Local
Description: Science Day will be a CFSAC hosted series of
presentations on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Topics will include
etiology,host factors, and immunologic factors associated with CFS as
well as quality of life issues.
-
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee (CFSAC) October 2010 - Day 2
View event: You will be able to view the event at
http://videocast.nih.gov when the event is live.
http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=9506
Air date: Wednesday, October 13, 2010, 9:00:00 AM
Time displayed is Eastern Time, Washington DC Local
Description: This is a formal advisory committee meeting with CFSAC
members. An agenda will be provided at a later time.
-
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee (CFSAC) October 2010 - Day 3
View event: You will be able to view the event at
http://videocast.nih.gov when the event is live.
http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=9507
Air date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 9:00:00 AM
Time displayed is Eastern Time, Washington DC Local
Description: This is a formal advisory committee meeting with CFSAC
members. An agenda will be provided at a later time.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Homage to a Homager | Herdisms Blog
Monday, September 27, 2010
Key to being an empowered patient: Trust your gut
That's roughly the same number of people who live in Idaho. You don't have to be a statistic. All this week, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen will share tips with viewers for staying safe in medical situations. The first lesson: Trust your gut.
Psychiatric Misdiagnoses in Patients with CFS
Here is David Sampson's comment on the recent Peter White et al paper entitled "Psychiatric misdiagnoses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome" published in the JRSM Short Reports:
Re- Peter White et al (2010) Psychiatric misdiagnoses in patients with
chronic fatigue syndrome :Tara Lawn1 ? Praveen Kumar1 ? Bernice Knight2 ?
Michael Sharpe3 ? Peter D White4 on behalf of the PACE trial management
group (listed in protocol reference). J R Soc Med Sh Rep 2010;1:28. DOI
10.1258/shorts.2010.010042
http://shortreports.rsmjournals.com/content/1/4/28.full
In this paper Professor White notes the high prevalence of co-morbid
psychiatric illness in a cohort of CFS sufferers (56%) defined using the Oxford
CFS Criteria and their under-diagnosis by clinicians in a secondary care
specialist Chronic Fatigue Syndrome clinic.
The main question concerns the validity of employing the Oxford CFS
criteria in this study. Rates of co-morbid psychiatric illness in ME/CFS patients
are known to be affected by diagnostic criteria which clearly influence
patient selection (Jason, 2004).
In assessing the validity of the Oxford CFS criteria it is interesting
that Professor White himself noted in his original Lancet paper (White, 2001)
examining various CFS criteria that: "both mood disorder at 2 months and
emotional personality (neuroticism) predicted Oxford-defined CFS...These
predictions of CFS were related more to having a co-morbid mood disorder than
to having CFS itself".
What is of critical importance is the fact that the strongest determinant
of an "Oxford defined CFS" are mood disorder and premorbid psychiatric
disorder/GP attendance in year before onset- all of which are predictors of
mood disorder/psychiatric illness quite independently of a fatigue syndrome
( see Sampson, 2010).
If such Oxford defined patients are ME/CFS patients who happen to have developed depression/psychiatric illness subsequently to CFS itself then premorbid psychiatric history would not be such a potent predictor- however it is.
This demonstrates yet again that not only do such broad criteria fail to
exclude patients with primary psychiatric diagnosis in the absence of
physical symptoms (Stein 2005, Jason 1997, Sampson 2010) but that these criteria
may be better at selecting such patients than ME/CFS patients per se.
If both ME/CFS and mood disorder/psychiatric illness were synonymous this
would not matter- however they are not. The genetics of ME/CFS, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, quantitive EEG and brain blood flow on SPECT all differentiate between CFS and mood disorder/depression (Stein, 2005).
This suggests that at very best the Oxford CFS criteria are ambiguous and
at worst misleading and tautological in conception.
In fact as long ago as 2001 Professor White noted in his study examining
various ME/CFS criteria "These data support the difference in nosology and
aetiology between acute and chronic fatigue syndromes (of relatively short
duration) and mood disorders. They also suggests that the Oxford and CDC
criteria for CFS should be used with caution or only with stratification by
mood disorder in aetiological studies".
David Sampson BSC(Hons),MSc,MBPsychS
References
Jason L. et al. (2004) Comparing the Fukuda et al Criteria and the
Canadian Case definition for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome ,12, 37-52.
White P. et al. (2001); Lancet, Vol. 358, N.9297; pp 1946-1953 Predictions
and associations of fatigue syndromes and mood disorders that occur after
infectious mononucleosis.
Sampson D.P. (2010) Close Analysis of a Large Published Trial Into
Fatigue Syndromes and Mood Disorders That Occur After Documented Viral Infection.
Bulletin of the IACFS/ME, Vol 18,Issue 2, Summer 2010.
Stein E (2005). Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Assessment and Treatment of
Patients with ME/CFS: Clinical Guidelines for Psychiatrists.
Jason L. (1997). Politics, Science, and the Emergence of a New Disease:
The Case of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, American Psychologist; Vol. 52, No. 9,
973-983.
Why am I so tired? - CNN.com
Of course, they don't list CFS, so we have to.